Archive for the ‘Sustainability’ Category

Goal for the Consumer Staples Sector: Wholeness

Posted by: Ben Bingham

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

Consumer Staples: Wholeness

Consumer Staples as a sector is mostly associated with non-cyclical essentials for life such as food and other products that are considered essential or are consumed on a regular basis without too much variation. It is what is acquired on the regular shopping trips as opposed to what is acquired when furnishing a home or getting prepared to return to school after summer vacation.  Nor does this sector include splurges or vacation spending. It is closely related to who we are day in and day out.  The phrase, “we are what we eat” comes to mind.

So what is important in this sector is that it defines who we are in the most basic sense. As human “becomings” we can choose to invest in consumer staples that enhance human lives daily.  Food that is grown in a mechanical way with synthetic inputs and outputs that appear to control production but avoid interaction with the micro flora of topsoil is likely to nourish in a way that is unsatisfying.  In the developed world, obesity may be linked to the consumption of food that leaves the consumer unsatisfied and longing for more. Just as the chemicals pass directly into the plant, by-passing the need for developing deep and broad root systems, the resulting food is not filled with the rich nutrients of the earth. Oddly we are in a situation where malnutrition and obesity seem to go hand in hand.

The answer to this situation is to invest in natural, organic, whole systems thinking that will support healthy food that truly nourishes and other consumer staples like paper products and detergents that consider the whole. Humans need to be taken care of on the level of subsistence, but there is something also nourishing when we consciously participate in the whole processes of agriculture and nature behind the food and other products which wind up in our homes every day. Once chemists took over the agriculture schools, it was no longer possible to follow what went into our food.  The archetypal activities of animal husbandry, composting, companion planting and the like (see the chapter on “all I needed to know”) provide beautiful nourishing pictures that can be part of the healthy digestion process as we give thanks before a meal. The researcher can seek companies that not only use holistic systems for producing healthy staples, but reach out to consumers to help educate them in the archetypes of agricultural and natural life…so that in the end there is a sense of wholeness in the home.

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Imagine Multiple Outcomes

Posted by: Sam Folin

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

While we ponder  the economy and markets and equity returns it is important to be firmly rooted in probabilities rather than certainties.

The first step in this process is to be very clear what is fact, what is informed opinion and what is simply future forecasting. Forecasting the future is a fool’s errand.

Very important to understand the difference.

Some history might help me explain:

In 2007 we thought the market was going to go down in the year or two to come based on equity over-valuation, the rapid erosion of the housing bubble, and the major excesses playing themselves out in a speculative market. This was not a forecast exactly but rather we thought it was a likely outcome with a very high probability of 80%.

In our work an 80% probability is very rare. I have been conscious of this level of certainty only twice in the last 20 years.

Our current outlook for stocks to reach ridiculously cheap levels sometime in the next 5 years only has about a 60% probability. Still high but less certain and almost meaningless given the time frame.

That leads us to a discussion of risk. By 1999 (during the tech bubble) I was certain stocks were headed for a fall. I did not pretend to know when, but thought it would come within months or a year at most. Stocks were ridiculously overvalued. Managing the risk of an equity collapse was job 1. Recognize that the possible outcomes from the vantage point of 1/1/99 included a wide range of possibilities from +15% to -35%. The downside was much more severe a possibility than the possible upside would compensate for. I advised anyone who would listen to get out of stocks.

In the event stocks rose almost 24% that year. Most people who had heeded my advice thought I was nuts. Speculative fever was abroad in the land and everyone knew that the tech revolution was going to change everything. No more recessions, only growth! A couple of my friends who had reduced equity exposure actually went back into the market.

The market started its decline for real at the end of August 2000 and bottomed down 50% in March of 2003. Friends who heeded my advice in early 1999 managed to avoid a 33% decline.

The point of this story of humility and ultimate redemption is that when we look backward the outcome could have been different. The speculation might have continued for two years or more beyond 2000. Looking forward from 1/1/1999 there were myriad possibilities. The judgment made at the time was that the downside risk was A major risk and therefore that possibility required action. Owning 60% stocks in a down 50% market is devastating to wealth.

This is an important discussion that will continue in coming weeks.

OSF

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

WikiPositive Enters its ‘Soft Launch’ Phase!

Posted by: Rachael Stephens

Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

The website is now emerging from its second phase of development and beginning a “soft launch” period, during which it is signing up social entrepreneurs, organizations and companies who are making a net positive impact and want to post information on their initiatives or other positive initiatives they have found. WikiPositive is designed to be the first open-source, collaborative platform providing a simple starting point for research on companies with products or services that are good for the world. Ample space for critiques and questions will provide a healthy dialogue around key questions and issues in the sustainable and positive impact space. (more…)

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

Doing Well By Doing Good

Posted by: Ben Bingham

Friday, July 2nd, 2010

It may have been Amy Domini who first applied Benjamin Franklin’s phrase to investing. The idea of Socially Responsible Investing or SRI was to do well financially by investing in good companies, or, at least, companies trying to change for the better.  The Market, which is where this and most investing happens, could be considered nothing more than a bazaar of tourists and hawkers haggling over prices.  The sound and fury seems to signify nothing more than a momentary consensus on the valuation of companies.  The basis of these valuations is sometimes rational and sometimes emotional. (more…)

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

What Lies Ahead?

Posted by: Sam Folin

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Donald Rumsfeld was infamous for his time as Secretary of Defense under GW Bush. Perhaps his most memorable statement was something like, “..we have the known unknowns but it is the unknown unknowns that are the problems.”

The NYTimes Blog, Opinionator, carried a wonderful description of this yesterday and I encourage you to read it. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/the-anosognosics-dilemma-1/

The basic idea is that that we have blind spots -situations where we do not even know the questions to ask. There are things we don’t know such as, When and where will the next terrorist attack happen  in the world/US?

There are also things we don’t know that we don’t know. Hence Rumsfeld’s unknown unknowns. It sounded goofy at the time but it was a rather profound statement.

Looking ahead in US Economic doings one wonders what questions we are unaware of. (more…)

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Share/Bookmark

© 2010 Benchmark Asset Managers, LLC

Contact Us | Terms | Sitemap